The pulps are supposed to be racist. I mean, if you hear anything about the pulps it generally about how racist they are. Somehow the legions of people that are literally shaking after reading “The Shadow Over Innsmouth” never talk about how the pulpiest of pulp science fiction romances was between an ex-Confederate and a Red Martian, where they even had a son that was racially mixed, and where the hero was best buddies with a Green Martian and even went on adventures with an awesomely heroic Black Martian. And the guy that was the undisputed king of science fiction, fantasy, and horror at the time…? He wrote a letter in to Argosy describing his own race as “the white plague.”
Now imagine my surprise when I’m reading that guy’s signature novel and he introduces a Persian and a Ninevite into the line-up of the hero’s associates and allies. I admit it, I honestly wondered how it could work. Anyone that grows in the West is going to struggle with this and I don’t think it’s accurate at all to reduce this mere racism. I mean, if you found yourself on a blind date with a girl named Delilah, you would probably take pause. If you woke up one day and found yourself betrothed to a “Jezebel”, your heart would stop. That’s not due to you being any variety of “ist” and it’s not due to any ambient “ism” that permeates everything around you. It’s a testament to the inherent power of stories and storytelling. They continue to exert pull even among a people that is doing their darndest to overwrite them.
History matters. When A. Merritt introduces a Norse character named Sigurd, we immediately warm to him. It’s not just that Vikings are inherently awesome. It’s not even that we are half conscious of the fact that there are operas about this sort of character or that Bugs Bunny would have dressed up like the guy’s girlfriend. Guys like Sigurd are us. They didn’t just rape and pillage in what would become England. They settled down. Some sort of understanding was reached between Christian and invader. And this new synthesis was immortalized in the very foundation of English literature via works like Beowulf. If you speak English, you have been primed your entire life to admire characters like Sigurd.
Ninevites, now…? It’s quite the opposite case, isn’t it? These were the decedents of the people that the Israelites were supposed to have wiped out. These were the people that prophets like Jonah did not even want to preach to– and when he did buckle down and go to them, he was distraught when they actually repented because he knew God would sparethem. That kind of outright hatred reverberates in the lumber rooms of our minds of people that don’t even read the old stories. The idea that someone could reduce something like this down to purely racial motivations is baffling. This goes far deeper than that. You’re talking about a culture clash that goes back to Scipio plowing Carthage under and salting the earth.
So what about the Persian…? I hate to say it, but if you roll out a Persian hero in the West you have made a fairly challenging problem for yourself. And it’s not just due to the fact that Persia once (just like Carthage) posed a mortal threat to the West. No, you have to deal with the absolutely humiliating defeat of Darius III at the hands of Alexander. Thanks to our stories and histories, his cowardice is the face of an entire nation.
The way that A. Merritt managed to win his audience over to a Persian character is instructive. He puts him in position to stoically fight the equivalent of The Battle of Thermopylae so that the leading man and his love interest can make a getaway during the climax. There is not one hint of irony there. Not one whit. Pulp fantasy is practically devoid of snark and condescension. You just don’t see that stuff come into the picture until the Campbellian Revolution made fantasy’s survival utterly dependent on a Poindexter like L. Sprague de Camp. People in the pulp era did not actually have that big of a problem with racism. The most revered writers of the period were in fact expert in making people admire heroes of other races and other cultures. Here is how they did it: by showing they living up to the values and ideals of Western culture.
And it really does work. I want to read books about “people like me” as much as anybody. But Nick Cole’s Control-Alt Revolt! is incredibly attractive in spite of the fact that it has a handicapped female protagonist that is nothing at all “like me.” Why is that? She embodies the cultural ideals I identify with and character traits I admire. Contrast that with the sequel to Jurassic Park where the protagonists sneak into the bad guys’ camp, set the captive dinosaurs free, and trigger a rampage that kills dozens of people and leaves “good guys” and “bad guys” alike stranded in a death trap. It’s painful, really. I guess I’m supposed to be rooting for the animal rights activists, but without the cultural touchstones that are the definition of likability in the West, there is no way for me to invest in the characters or get excited by the action.
No amount of CGI can salvage something like that.
This also explains a great many reactions that have occurred in the wake of Appendix N’s rediscovery within the wider book blogging scene. P. Alexander, editor of Cirsova magazine, feels betrayed by the fact that Earthsea Trilogy was what he came up on rather than Vance and Leiber and Brackett. Meanwhile, when new readers take a look at Cugel the Clever after hearing us rave over him, they really have a hard time appreciating him if they have read Tarzan and Conan first. The pulp icons tap into the Western ideals that the New Wave was attempting to undermine. Publishing changed… but at heart, readers were still Westerners at heart. When they see characters that actually tap in to who they are, they have a very hard time getting excited about what they see on television anymore.
The fact is, Martin Luther King’s exhortation to “judge people by the content of their character” was effective rhetoric because that was something his listeners would have taken for granted. And three decades of nonstop cultural programming to the contrary really have failed to change that about us.
One of your best pieces.
Though my ideas of Persia come from the Prince of Persia games and (underrated and not half bad) film, so I think Persia is beautiful, exotic and awesome.
That and Herodotus’ Histories (I can’t remember if he dissed Persia or not).
It’s what HR Haggard did so well (and the virtues he showed transcended cultural differences anyway, not racial ones–race was not relevant).
The tales in The Thousand and One Nights are mostly Persian in origin. Scheherazade and Shahryar, the queen and king who are the frame for the stories, are Persian.
Merritt was a big Haggard fan.
I always thought Zubran the Persian was a great character.
Historically, the Persian culture was so virile it produced THREE separate empires. They were the “Greece” of the Middle East, looked to as the cultural standard. Nothing could keep them down for good until the Arab supremacist Religion of Peace crushed them in a moment of war-ravaged weakness.
Even then, the Persian influence was HUGE. Many of the “Arabic” or “Muslim” scholars and artists of the Middle Ages were actually Persian. Omar Khayyam was Persian. The “Arabian” Nights are largely Persian. As Bernard Lewis and many others have pointed out, the Persian influence on the Turks was enormous. Once again, the Persians were looked upon as the cultural standard to aspire to.
The Old Testament is quite approving of the Persians. The Three Magi were Persians, NOT the multiculti silliness we’ve seen for so long.
Persians are Indo-Europeans. They share far more linguistic and genetic heritage with an ethnic Russian or Frenchman than they do with say, Osama bin Laden. They are not Arabs nor were they ever.
That hot chick on JAG was a Persian, BTW. So was Freddie Mercury.
One of my good old friends and a former housemate is Persian. He’s probably the single funniest person I’ve ever known, although I can’t really repeat any of his humor because it’s mostly of the “you have to be there” type and it’s also incredibly raunchy.
Yes, but Freddie Mercury was well known for living up to the values and ideals of Western culture.
I remember on the movie Crash, I remember a scene where a Persian family’s shop is vandalized. The Persian wife states that those who damaged her shop can’t tell the difference between Arabs and Persians, since the graffiti called the owners Arabs.
Apparently, it’s common to lump Persians and Arabs together.
Ha, I still remember the father of my aforementioned friend commenting on the Gulf War: “Why Iraq? We should have invaded Iran – they would know what to do with the great gift of democracy. Not like these dumb $#!%ing Arabs….” So yeah, best not to confuse the two 😉
Did someone say he didn’t?
My reply was to HP.
Back on track… Zubran’s last stand was EPIC. Loved it. Gets me every time.
*Mounts his hobby-horse*
Although it’s not so much about human races*, I think Doc Smith always handled this well – he goes so far as to say that the (to us, cowardly, dishonourable, compassion-less…) Palainians were basically 2nd best to humans in the Lensman book, and that if they’d been just a bit more like us they’d have been the future Guardians of Civilisation (just think of it: Azathoth on crack – ie Nadreck’s children – as the successors to Mentor & the Arisians… sweet dreams 🙂 ).
The Skylark books have rather fewer aliens, but even there it’s a case of good vs evil (us vs the Fenachrone), and Richard Seaton says “humanity uber alles” when he talks about saving humans from a distant galaxy from their evil alien overlords.
= + =
* There is precisely one human in all 7 Lensman books who is definitely not white – a black car park attendant in “First Lensman”. In the Skylark series there’s Crane’s butler Shiro (and later his girlfriend / wife), who has a poor command of English but is otherwise a sterling, if minor, character. DuQuesne and his love interest may have had some non-northern European ancestry to them, and DuQuesne had a pair of black housekeepers / domestic staff, but… that’s basically it.
Doc Smith was a big Merritt fan. He even quoted a Merritt story in one of his own. Thus, in that timeline, Merritt is still honored and read by men of valor in the far future, which is as it should be.
“Meanwhile, when new readers take a look at Cugel the Clever after hearing us rave over him, they really have a hard time appreciating him if they have read Tarzan and Conan first.”
If people are looking for a New Wave descendant of Tarzan and Conan they could do a whole lot worse then reading E.C Tubb’s Dumarest Saga series.
I have not read Brackett’s Stark stories nor C. L. Moore’s Northwest stories so it is possible that Tubb’s got the Conan and Tarzan vibe via them, but what I am seeing in the Dumarest books (I started Toyman 3rd in his series last night) IS Planetary Conan.
Jeffro, you obviously got me reading Tubb with your essay in Cirsova issue #1 demonstrating where Traveller got its inspiration from.
Thing is Traveller has a barbarian class yet so far I see no barbarians in Tubb’s books….
The only character with barbarian primal instincts, innate chivalrous morality and comes from a gloomy land with a sort of life that fits the bill is Dumarest himself!
Tubb was an admitted Brackett fan.
We have seen that before though.
GRRM is a fan of REH’s Conan.
Ditto Moorcock.
Heinlein is a fan of ERB.
Neil Gaiman has a pulp list of inspirations a mile long
Tubb as far as I can see is not a “fan” like them. Unlike the above, and probably many more could be named, Tubb did not subvert or deconstruct or snark at his pulp inspirations.
Moorcock really wasn’t/isn’t a Conan fan, except in an abstract sense. He’s admitted as much more than once. His attempt to write just ONE chapter of a Howardian hero in “Ghor, Kin_Slayer” was a disaster. He’s a Leiber guy — no offense to Leiber.
Dumarest is cool, but I’ll take Brackett’s damaged spacers when all is said and done.
Was about to comment, but it looks like that Ship of Ishtar has sailed.
I’m confused. Is this supposed to be one of those “Dems r the real racist” assays?
I don’t think this was supposed to be one of those “assays” * at all
*essays where you make an ass out of someone
But yes, to answer your question, during the Pulp era of the 1920s, the Dems controlled the Jim Crow South–and democrat progressive Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld forced sterilization in Buck v. Bell (1927)
Merritt’s Magic
I’d like to give you an example of just how good A. Merritt was. I read the Ship of Ishtar years ago, and then loaned out the paperback to someone, who either moved or loaned it to someone else, and it was gone. This just happens with books, sometimes.
Then Jeffro began this series, and the old magic of this book cast its spell on me again. I decided to buy a copy the next time I saw it in paperback. That decision became more immediate when I learned of the role Damon Knight and James Blish had in wrecking Merritt’s reputation, and I went on Amazon to buy a copy.
I lucked out; I managed to snag a copy of the memorial edition put out by Borden, illustrated by Virgil Finlay, autographed by Finlay himself (one of Merritt’s favorite artists). That copy arrived on 2/11/17, and I gave it to my mother to read (being Mater Familias has its perks). She loved it, but I wasn’t home when she finished, so one of my brothers grabbed it; he liked it, his wife liked it, then a sister got it and then another sister…
I’ve owned that book for 5 weeks and haven’t read a word of the text yet! This is almost as bad the those Rachel Griffin books by that Lamplighter woman. Four generations of the girls in my family are reading those books and I haven’t been able to finish even one of them. It just isn’t fair.
Oh, and that autograph by Finlay?
“In Memory of A. Merritt, The Lord of Fantasy, Virgil Finlay.”
Sounds like a heckuva buy! For a reading copy, you really should try and get hold of the Paizo edition:
http://leogrin.com/CimmerianBlog/merritts-the-ship-of-ishtar-from-planet-stories-paizo/
Definitive text and ALL of the Finlay art from BOTH of the times he illustrated the novel. Hard to beat.